Preview

Clinical and experimental thyroidology

Advanced search

Progress in Iodine Deficiency Disorders (IDD) Control and Elimination in Europe and Central Asia Region (ECAR) in 2010–2020

https://doi.org/10.14341/ket12713

Abstract

Salt iodization in Europe and Central Asia Region (ECAR) countries has a long history. Universal salt iodization (USI) strategies were reintroduced in ECAR countries in the mid-1990s and gained strong momentum during the 2000–2009 decade: by the end of 2009, access to adequately iodized salt by the population in ECAR had risen to 55% — a quantum leap improvement compared to a previous decade but still short of the operational target of 90%. The objective of this review was to document the USI achievements and challenges in the 18 ECAR countries during the decade of 2010-2020 and developed recommendations for actions to maintain the USI. The review was conducted by analysis of information obtained from a variety of sources, including communication with UNICEF country offices, IGN National Coordinators as well as online resources and publications available publicly. Based on available information, countries of the ECAR fall into 3 groups. Group 1. USI at scale: 11 countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, North Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Georgia) successfully sustained the adequate iodine status achieved earlier. This group should focus on USI maintenance ensuring that the USI target of uninterrupted universal use of iodized salt in households and food/bakery industry is included into relevant national programs, along with the salt reduction targets. Group 2. USI at scale but risk of slippage: 3 countries (Albania, Moldova and Kyrgyzstan) sustained the adequate iodine status of population but their household use of adequately iodized salt remains low and the use of iodized salt in processed foods — patchy, with weak regulatory monitoring and enforcement systems in place putting sustainability at risk. Recommendations for these countries are to secure strong regulatory monitoring and enforcement of the national iodized salt standards to ensure consistent and high (>90%) use of iodized salt at household level as well as in production in key salt-containing industrially processed staple foods (especially, bread). Group 3. USI — more efforts needed: in 4 countries (Russia, Tajikistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan), the population and, specifically, most vulnerable groups continued to suffer from inadequate iodine status. This group of countries will need to enhance and expand their existing USI effort by better engaging with salt producers and private sector and identifying resources for improved regulatory monitoring. Adoption of USI legislation is paramount to reaching high iodized salt coverage and optimum iodine nutrition in Russia and Ukraine.

The data and information in the present review confirm that USI strategy is successfully sustained in the majority of countries in the ECAR. The experiences in this region add to the growing evidence that USI is effective in alleviating iodine deficiency in the population and support the view that global success can be achieved by ensuring that food-grade salt iodization becomes the norm in the salt industry and society.

About the Authors

L. Turcan
International NGO “Iodine Global Network” (IGN)
Canada

Lilia Turcan, MPH

Ottawa



G. A. Gerasimov
International NGO “Iodine Global Network” (IGN)
Canada

Gregory A. Gerasimov, MD, PhD, professor

Ottawa



I. Parvanta
International NGO “Iodine Global Network” (IGN)
Canada

Ibrahim Parvanta, MS

Ottawa



A. Timmer
International NGO “Iodine Global Network” (IGN)
Canada

Arnold Timmer, MS

Ottawa



References

1. UNICEF/WHO (1994) World Summit for Children — Mid-decade goal: Iodine Deficiency Disorders. In Joint Committee on Health Policy. UNICEF/WHO: Geneva.

2. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution A/70/L.1 adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015.

3. United Nations Department of Global Communications. Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals

4. World Health Organization (2014) Guideline: Fortification of Food- Grade Salt with Iodine for the Prevention and Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders. Geneva: WHO; available at http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/fortification_foodgrade_saltwithiodine/en

5. Knowles J, van der Haar F, Sherata M, et al. Iodine intake through the processed food: Case studies from Egypt, Indonesia, the Philippines, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, 2010-2015. Nutrients. 2017;9(8):797.

6. Gerasimov G. Iodine Deficiency Disorders (IDD) in the Russian Federation: A Review of Policies towards IDD Prevention and Control and Trends in IDD Epidemiology (1950-2002). Moscow, 2002.

7. Van der Haar F. Strengthening IDD prevention in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. IDD Newsletter. 2015;43(4):6-7.

8. Gerasimov G, van der Haar F, Lazarus J. Overview of Iodine Deficiency Prevention Strategies in the South-Eastern Europe and Central Asia Region: 2009–2016. Clinical and experimental thyroidology. 2017;13(4):4-10. doi: 10.14341/ket9531

9. The World Bank Group. Global Economic Prospects — June 2020: Europe and Central Asia. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/brief/global-economic-prospects-europe-andcentral-asia

10. Van Der Haar F, Gerasimov G, Tyler VQ, Timmer A. Universal salt iodization in the central and eastern europe, commonwealth of independent states (CEE/CIS) region during the decade 2000-09: Experiences, achievements, and lessons learned. Food Nutr Bull. 2011;32(SUPPL. 4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/15648265110324s401

11. WHO GINA database. Available at: https://extranet.who.int/nutrition/gina/en/policies/summary

12. WHO, UNICEF, ICCIDD (2007, Third ed.). Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders and monitoring their elimination: A guide for programme managers. Geneva: WHO

13. Dold S, Zimmermann MB, Jukic T, et al. Universal salt iodization provides sufficient dietary iodine to achieve adequate iodine nutrition during the first 1000 days: A crosssectional multicenter study. J Nutr. 2018;148(4):587-598. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxy015

14. Authors personal communications with national nutrition /USI focal points.

15. WHO Global database on the Implementation of Nutrition Actions (GINA). Available at: https://extranet.who.int/nutrition/gina/en/policies/summary

16. Codling K, Quang NV, Phong L, et al. The Rise and Fall of Universal Salt Iodization in Vietnam: Lessons Learned for Designing Sustainable Food Fortification Programs with a Public Health Impact. Food and Nutrition Bulletin. 2015;36(4):441-454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0379572115616039

17. WHO. ‘Best buys’ and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases updated (2017): Appendix 3 of the global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013-2020.

18. Powles J, Fahimi S, Micha R, et al. Global, regional and national sodium intakes in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis of 24 h urinary sodium excretion and dietary surveys worldwide. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003733. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003733

19. Fifty-Seventh World Health Assembly. Resolution WHA57.17 on the Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. 2004.

20. Rowe LA. Addressing the Fortification Quality Gap: A Proposed Way Forward. Nutrients. 2020 Dec 20;12(12):3899. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12123899. PMID: 33419334; PMCID: PMC7766708.

21. Bagriansky J, Gerasimov G. Cooperation between salt farmers and a salt producer improves the quality of iodized salt in Azerbaijan. IDD Newsletter. 2017;45(1):6-7.

22. Garrett G, Latypova M. Tajikistan scales-up efforts to tackle iodine deficiency. IDD Newsletter. 2015;43(3):12-13.

23. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN). Regulatory Monitoring of National Food Fortification Programs: A Policy Guidance Document. Global Fortification Technical Advisory Group (GF-TAG). 2018. Available at: https://www.gainhealth.org/sites/default/files/publications/documents/regulatory-monitoring-policy-guidance-doc-2018.pdf

24. IMF. Policy responces to Covid19. (Mozambique, in particular). Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/imf-and-covid19/Policy-Responses-to-COVID-19

25. Luthringer CL, Rowe LA, Vossenaar M, Garrett GS. Regulatory Monitoring of Fortified Foods: Identifying Barriers and Good Practices. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2015;3(3):446-461. doi: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-15-00171

26. Gerasimov GA, Turcan L, Aslanian H, et al. Modeling of iodine consumption with industrial processed foods made with iodized salt in the adults and pregnant in Armenia and Moldova. Voprosy pitaniia [Problems of Nutrition]. 2021;90(1):49-56. doi: https://doi. org/10.33029/0042-8833-2021-90-1-49-56 (in Russian).

27. International Finance Corporation (IFC). Reforming Food Safety Regulation in Ukraine: Proposals for Policymakers. A BACKGROUND POLICY PAPER. Nr 48669. 2009/

28. International Finance Corporation (IFC). Legal and institutional review of inspection functions/official controls in the REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA. 2016/

29. PARLAMENTUL Republicii Moldova. LEGE Nr. 306 din 30-11-2018 privind siguranța alimentelor. Publicat : 22-02-2019 în Monitorul Oficial Nr. 59-65 art. 120 (Food Safety Law)/

30. GFDx. FOOD FORTIFICATION Dashboard. Available at: https:// fortificationdata.org/list-of-countries-for-the-food-fortification-dashboard/

31. FAO. Available at: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/codex-texts/list-standards/en/

32. Zimmermann MB, Andersson M. GLOBAL ENDOCRINOLOGY: Global perspectives in endocrinology: coverage of iodized salt programs and iodine status in 2020. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021;185(1):R13-R21. doi: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-21-0171

33. Assessment of iodine nutrition status in school-aged children (6-12 years) of Albania. Survey report, Tirana, 2021.

34. Sharmanov T, Tazhibayev R, Ospanova F. The organization of the permanent biological monitoring of iodine, iron, folic acid and vitamin A nutrition in all regions and cities Astana and Almaty, 2011, Report by Kazakh Academy of Nutrition.

35. National Nutrition Survey in Tajikistan, UNICEF. Dushanbe, 2017. 119 p. 36. Sultanalieva RB, Beishekeyeva GI, Gerasimov GA. Assessment of the provision of iodine supply to pregnant and lactating women in Kyrgyzstan. Clinical and experimental thyroidology. 2016;12(1):34-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/ket2016134737

36. Gerasimov G, Sturua L, Ugulava T, van der Haar F. Georgia celebrates sustained optimal iodine nutrition. IDD Newsletter. 2018;1:1-5.

37. Hutchings N, Gerasimov G. Salt iodization in Armenia: A model of sustained success. IDD Newsletter. 2017;45(4):2-3.

38. Gerasimov G, Tulisov A, Tuzhba A, et al. Children and pregnant women in Abkhazia are iodine deficient. IDD Newsletter. 2016;44(3):15-16.

39. Hutchings N, Baghdasaryan S, Qefoyan M, et al. IODINE NUTRITION IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARTSAKH (NAGORNO KARABAKH). Endocr Pract. 2018;24(5):468-472. doi: https://doi.org/10.4158/EP-2018-0054

40. Assessment of Iodine Status of School-Age Children in Montenegro. Report by Institute of Public Health of Montenegro, Podgorica, 2021.

41. Gerasimov G. Uzbekistan: low iodine intake in pregnant women reflects poor coverage with iodized salt. IDD Newsletter. 2020;1:15-17.

42. Mokhort TV, Petrenko SV, Leushev BY, et al. Assessment of iodine status among school age children and pregnant women of Belarus in 2017-2018. Clinical and experimental thyroidology. 2018;14(3):149-155. doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/ket9732

43. Assessment of the quality of iodine in salt and iodine statues of school age children. 2018. Report by National Institute of Public Health, Kosovo.

44. Assessment of iodine nutrition status in school-age children (6-12 years) of Albania. Unpublished report by Albanian Society of Endocrinology, Tirana, 2021

45. Kostova N, Karanfilski B, MiladinovaD, et al. Universal salt iodization contributes to health equity: socio-economic status does not affect iodine status in children in Macedonia. bioRxiv. 2020.12.24.424286; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.24.424286

46. D’Elia L, Obreja G, Ciobanu A, Breda J, Jewell J, Cappuccio FP. Sodium, Potassium and Iodine Intake, in a National Adult Population Sample of the Republic of Moldova. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2896. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122896

47. Troshina EA, Mazurina NV, Senyushkina ES, et al. Monitoring of iodine deficiency disorders in the Republic of Tyva. Problems of Endocrinology. 2021;67(1):60-68. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/probl12715

48. Troshina EA, Senyushkina ES, Makolina NP, et al. Iodine Deficiency Disorders: Current State of the Problem in the Republic of Crimea. Clinical and experimental thyroidology. 2020;16(4):19-27. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/ket12700

49. Troshina EA, Makolina NP, Senyushkina ES, et al. Iodine Deficiency Disorders: Current State of the Problem in the Bryansk Region. Problems of Endocrinology. 2021;67(4):84-93. (In Russ.). doi: https://doi.org/10.14341/probl12793

50. Tsiklauri R, Parvanta I, Jijeishvili L, Kherkheulidze M, Kazakhashvili N. Nutrition Status Surveillance System in Georgia. Acta Sci Nutr Heal. 2019;3(10):03-06. doi: https://doi.org/10.31080/ASNH.2019.03.0434

51. Ittermann T, Albrecht D, Arohonka P, et al. Standardized Map of Iodine Status in Europe. Thyroid. 2020;30(9):1346-1354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2019.0353

52. Ministerul Sanatatii al RM. Statutul nutrițional în iod al populației din Republica Moldova. Raport final. 2012 (in Romanian).

53. OCED. Regulatory Quality and COVID-19: Managing the Risks and Supporting the Recovery. Note by the Secretariat in consultation with the Chairs and the Bureaus of the Regulatory Policy Committee and the Network of Economic Regulators.


Review

For citations:


Turcan L., Gerasimov G.A., Parvanta I., Timmer A. Progress in Iodine Deficiency Disorders (IDD) Control and Elimination in Europe and Central Asia Region (ECAR) in 2010–2020. Clinical and experimental thyroidology. 2021;17(4):4-16. https://doi.org/10.14341/ket12713

Views: 937


ISSN 1995-5472 (Print)
ISSN 2310-3787 (Online)